Policy & Regulation Duke Energy aims to double renewable energy capacity by 2030 John Engel 2.14.2022 Share The Duke owned and operated, 912 MW Los Vientos Wind Farm in Texas (Courtesy: Duke Energy) Follow @EngelsAngle "House Bill 951 encourages Duke Energy to invest billions of dollars in infrastructure needed to reduce carbon emissions, and the public utilities commission will allow for cost recovery via increased electricity rates," Kern told Renewable Energy World. "Duke Energy shareholders could eventually profit from this investment, and I think that was probably important in getting buy-in from the utility. "Electricity customers will absolutely see higher bills, but that is unavoidable if we are talking about taking meaningful steps to mitigate climate change." Stakeholders who are engaging in the crafting of the North Carolina Carbon Plan, meanwhile, are waiting for Duke to jumpstart transmission planning to meet solar's growing demand for interconnection. Duke "has not engaged or presented to stakeholders what kind of transmission planning that would include and how Duke plans to get that going before 2030," said Maggie Shober, research director for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. Expanded emissions target Duke Energy's Sutton Combined-Cycle plant in Wilmington, North Carolina (Courtesy: Duke Energy) Duke also announced that the utility's 2050 net-zero goals would expand to include Scope 2 and certain Scope 3 emissions. The utility said it would include emissions from "the power it purchases for resale, from the procurement of fossil fuels used for generation and from the electricity purchased for its own use." Duke added a new net-zero by 2050 goal for the natural gas business that includes "upstream methane and carbon emissions related to purchased gas and downstream carbon emissions from customers' consumption." Duke claims to have already reduced Scope 1 emissions from electricity generation by 44% from 2005 levels. Matt Abele of the NC Sustainable Energy Association told Renewable Energy World that Duke's announced coal plant closures are the result of HB951, which allowed the utility to recoup costs from retirements. He said he remains skeptical about Duke's expanded emissions targets. “The jury is still out" on Duke's additional commitment to Scope 2/3 emissions. He said the utility "still seems fairly committed to natural gas in its own fleet" under Scope 1. He pointed to Duke's latest integrated resource plan as evidence. He also cited "expanded efforts for cross-state collaboration" through mechanisms like the Southeast Energy Exchange Market that "may actually increase" natural gas dependency in the state. Duke is among the 15 utilities that so far have backed the SEEM market design. Related Posts How the Inflation Reduction Act is playing out in one of the ‘most biased’ states for renewables Massachusetts Senate approves bill to expand reliance on renewable energy N.C.’s ratepayer advocate: Duke Energy ‘failed’ to consider incentives that would cut costs & enable more clean energy The ‘Wild West’ of hooking up large solar projects in New Hampshire